I'll be speaking about "AI for Science Communication" this afternoon at an EU Agency's webinar.
A few practical prompts for scientists that come to mind:
1. "Carefully analyze this scientific study and point out 10 logical flaws or claims that are not properly supported by evidence in the paper."
2. "Turn this abstract into a powerful argument for [...] but make sure that you avoid the 'backfire effect' and similar traps."
3. "Suggest persuasive arguments for an audience that is 'on the fence' or 'undecided' about their interest or commitment to this issue."
4. "Take this dataset [attached] and come up with 3 visual metaphors that I can use to demonstrate their relevance in a relatable manner, while staying accurate to the findings."
5. "Turn this study into a news article, applying the 'inverted pyramid' approach, while making sure it's understandable for a non-expert audience but it's serious and factual at the same time. Include references to the data you used."
Hope this helps. If so, consider sharing it with fellow scientists & science communicators.
**This was originally posted on Andras Baneth's LinkedIn account.